Effective Access to Care in a Crisis Period: Hypertension Control During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Telemedicine.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of telemedicine video visits in the management of hypertensive patients at home during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A quantitative analysis was performed of all home video visits coded with a diagnosis of essential hypertension during the first 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 through February 2021). A total of 10,634 patients with 16,194 hypertension visits were present in our national telemedicine practice database during this time. Among this population, a total of 569 patients who had 1785 hypertension visits met the criteria of having 2 or more blood pressure (BP) readings, with the last BP reading occurring in the report period. We analyzed baseline characteristics and BP trends of these 569 patients during the study period. Voluntarily submitted patient satisfaction ratings, which were systematically requested at the end of each visit, were also analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in this study cohort of 569 patients was 43.9 years, and 48.3% (275) were women. More than 62% (355) of the patients had an initial systolic BP (SBP) above 140 mm Hg, and 25.3% (144) had an initial SBP of greater than 160 mm Hg. The average number of visits during the study period was 3.1 visits per patient; an average of 6.4 BP measurements per patient were available. During the study period, 77% (438) of the patients experienced an improvement in either SBP or diastolic BP (DBP), with mean reductions of -9.7 mm Hg and -6.8 mm Hg in SBP and DBP, respectively. A total of 416 patients in the cohort started with a BP above 140/90 mm Hg. For this subset of patients, 55.7% (232) achieved a BP of 140/90 mm Hg or lower by the end of the study period, and the average reductions in SBP and DBP were -17.9 mm Hg and -12.8 mm Hg, respectively, which corresponded to improvements of 11.2% and 12.4%. These improvements did not vary significantly when patients were stratified by age, sex, or geographic region of residence (rural vs urban/suburban). Voluntarily submitted patient surveys indicated a high degree of patient satisfaction, with a mean satisfaction score of 4.94 (5-point scale). CONCLUSION: Clinician-patient relationships established in a video-first telemedicine model were broadly effective for addressing suboptimally controlled hypertension. Patient satisfaction with these visits was high.

Effective Access to Care in a Crisis Period: Hypertension Control during the COVID-19 Pandemic via Telemedicine

Objectives To assess the effectiveness of telemedicine video visits in the management of hypertensive patients at home during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also evaluated associated measures of patient satisfaction with these holistic visits. Patients and Methods A quantitative analysis was performed of all home video visits coded with a diagnosis of Essential Hypertension during the first 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic (March, 2020 through February, 2021). A total of 10,634 patients with 16,194 hypertension visits were present in our national telemedicine practice database during this time period. Among this population, a total of 569 patients who had 1,785 hypertension visits met the criteria of having two or more blood pressure readings, with the last blood pressure reading occurring in the report period. We analyzed baseline characteristics and blood pressure trends of these 569 patients over the study period. Voluntarily submitted patient satisfaction ratings, which were systematically requested at the end of each visit, were also analyzed. Results The mean age of the patients in this study cohort of 569 patients was 43.9 years, and 48.3% were women. Over 62% of the patients had an initial systolic BP over140 mm Hg, and 25% had an initial SBP of greater than 160 mm Hg. The average number of visits over the study period was 3.1 visits per patient. An average of 6.4 BP measurements per patient were available over the study period. Over the study period, 77% of the patients experienced an improvement in either systolic or diastolic blood pressure, with mean reductions of -9.7 mm Hg and -6.8 mm Hg in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively. A total of 416 patients in the cohort started with a blood pressure above 140/90 mm Hg. For this subset of patients, 55.7% achieved a BP of <=140/90 by the end of the study period, and the average reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressures were -17.9 mm Hg and -12.8 mm Hg respectively, which corresponded to improvements of 11.2% and 12.4% respectively. These improvements did not vary significantly when patients were stratified by age, sex, or geographic region of residence (rural versus urban/suburban). Voluntarily submitted patient surveys indicated a high degree of patient satisfaction, with a mean satisfaction score of 4.94 (5 point scale). Conclusion Clinician-patient relationships established in a video-first telemedicine model were broadly effective for addressing sub-optimally controlled hypertension. Patient satisfaction with these visits was very high.

Where Virtual Care Was Already a Reality: Experiences of a Nationwide Telehealth Service Provider During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in the use of and demand for telehealth services. OBJECTIVE: Here, we describe the utilization of telehealth services provided by Doctor On Demand, Inc., a well-known telehealth company in the United States, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also explore how the number of virtual visits, reasons for visits, and patients served changed over time. METHODS: We reported data as a percentage change from the baseline week during 2 distinct time periods: February-June 2019 and February-June 2020 based on 4 categories of visits: respiratory illness, unscheduled behavioral health, scheduled behavioral health, and chronic illness. RESULTS: In 2020, the total visit volume increased considerably from March through April 7, 2020 (59% above the baseline) and then declined through the week of June 2 (15% above the baseline). Visits for respiratory illnesses increased through the week of March 24 (30% above the baseline) and then steadily declined through the week of June 2 (65% below the baseline). Higher relative increases were observed for unscheduled behavioral health and chronic illness visits through April (109% and 131% above the baseline, respectively) before a decline through the week of June 2 (69% and 37% above the baseline, respectively). Increases in visit volume among rural residents were slightly higher than those among urban residents (peak at 64% vs 58% above the baseline, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although this telehealth service provider observed a substantial increase in the volume of visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is interesting to note that this growth was not fueled by COVID-19 concerns but by visits for behavioral health and chronic illness. Telehealth services may play a role as a "safety valve" for patients who have difficulty accessing care during a public health emergency.